OpenBCM V1.13-36-g8006 (Linux)

Packet Radio Mailbox

DB0FFL

[Box DB0FFL]

 Login: GAST





  
N1URO  > SYSOP    09.09.18 00:00l 30 Lines 901 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 7150_N1URO
Read: GAST
Subj: I0OJJ > Re: check you bbs
Path: DB0FFL<OE2XZR<OE1XAB<HG8LXL<N0KFQ<NS2B<N9PMO<I0OJJ<VE2PKT<N1URO
Sent: 180908/2143Z @:N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM #:7150 [Unionville] $:7150_N1URO

>From n1uro%n1uro.#cct.ct.usa.noam@i0ojj.ampr.org Sat Sep  8 23:48:42 2018
Received: from i0ojj.ampr.org by i0ojj.ampr.org (JNOS2.0k.3b) with SMTP
	id AA49686 ; Sat, 08 Sep 2018 23:48:42 +0200
Message-Id: <7150_N1URO@ve2pkt.bbs>
>From: n1uro@n1uro.#cct.ct.usa.noam
X-JNOS-User-Port: Telnet   (ve2pkt @ 144.172.216.109)  -> Sending message

From: N1URO@N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM
To  : SYSOP@WW

Gus;

> then the JNOS2 supply one name 'None" it is
> very normal... or it should forward with the
> "Subject:"  field blank which should be perhaps
> more incorrect.

In reality, NO software should make any changes on its own. Even JNOS2
should not take a null subject line and change it to "NONE".

> 4) I cannot oblige no one to use any software, but please
> stop to accuse the JNOS2

It's always the fault of JNOS or FBB or OpenBCM, or anyone else.
There's a few sysops who will back this up ;-) 

73




Lese vorherige Mail | Lese naechste Mail


 01.08.2026 04:47:21lZurueck Nach oben